Students investigate how to bring together different types of knowledge to make a case for environmental justice at a California school of their choice. Students learn that environmental injustices are deeply complex, interdisciplinary problems that require several different types of knowledge and expertise to effectively understand and address. Students investigate how to integrate different types of knowledge and evidence — such as ecological, historical, quantitative, qualitative, and moral — to make a case for an environmental solution. Students see this in action via a case study on dams on the Klamath River and the types of knowledge that led to their removal.
Students explore where to find data and information on environmental hazards in their case study location and what to do when information is conflicting. They examine how different groups and parties are affected, identifying factors that influence how those groups respond and considering other injustices. The unit culminates with students bringing different types of knowledge and evidence together to present a case study and plan for action.
“This did a great job of piquing students’ interest and sparking opposing points of view, which created lively discussions on the topic.”
“There is something for all different kinds of learners. We are moving spaces, drawing, talking in big and small groups, writing. Some of my kiddos who would have been disengaged quite possibly the entire time were engaged in at least two or more parts of this lesson.”
“I truly enjoyed teaching this. It has been heartwarming to see them care about other living things and the environment.”
“From my students: ‘Thank you for teaching us this lesson because if you didn’t it would be bad for our environment.’ ‘This was awesome! Can you do more? Thank you!’ ‘Thank you for helping us in taking care of the environment.'”
“This lesson brought in cultural stories from the original people who inhabited California. This is a perspective that is not often taught in science. I think that the kids liked having science be a little less facts and figures and more story.”
“Students really wanted to share their food traditions and look into how climate change might affect their food traditions.”
“Students really enjoyed the hands-on activity. They were very interested to learn about the different pollutants that they’ve never heard of. It also developed their curiosity about air quality and pollution. It was an eye-opener for some that they are able to see what is mostly ‘unseen’ by everyone.”
“I love how the data was more interactive and chunked into smaller pieces. I also like how there was a way to bring all the knowledge and wondering back to come up with a conclusion to the problem.”
“I am so amazed and impressed by the depth of resources that you embedded in the teacher guide. This is really well put together.”
“Using the maps and seeing things like schools and how close they are to hazards is really cool. They may not be super connected personally, but they can put themselves in the shoes of other kids and try to relate. I know it’s working because I have a kid that just watches Netflix all day, every day and he pulled out his earbud and participated!”
“When you’re out in the workforce, you’re trying to solve problems that don’t have a clear, immediate answer. So doing stuff like this helps give students practice.”
“Every lesson was so thoroughly designed, the case study design book was beautifully organized, and it helped to give my class a real-life understanding of how college/graduate-level academic research works. Being able to connect their research back to environmental issues they actually experience was simply icing on the cake. Well done!”
Ipsum dolor
Ipsum dolor
Ipsum dolor
Ipsum dolor
Ipsum dolor
Ipsum dolor
Ipsum dolor
Ipsum dolor
You’ll get news on Seeds to Solutions and environmental literacy from Ten Strands
© 2025 San Mateo County Office of Education and Ten Strands | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
