Students investigate how to bring together different types of knowledge to make a case for environmental justice at a California school of their choice. Students learn that environmental injustices are deeply complex, interdisciplinary problems that require several different types of knowledge and expertise to effectively understand and address. Students investigate how to integrate different types of knowledge and evidence — such as ecological, historical, quantitative, qualitative, and moral — to make a case for an environmental solution. Students see this in action via a case study on dams on the Klamath River and the types of knowledge that led to their removal.
Students explore where to find data and information on environmental hazards in their case study location and what to do when information is conflicting. They examine how different groups and parties are affected, identifying factors that influence how those groups respond and considering other injustices. The unit culminates with students bringing different types of knowledge and evidence together to present a case study and plan for action.
Want to talk through the lesson plans? Need support customizing a unit for your classroom?
Drop into office hours on the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of each month from 4:00-5:00pm PT for free support from Holly or another Seeds to Solutions team member.
“For my students who may not engage with abstract concepts, the real-life relevance of turning waste into soil for growing plants offers a clear, meaningful goal that they can understand and feel proud to participate in.”
“My students often refer to the experience and knowledge gained. I plan to use Seeds to Solutions lessons in the future.”
“The message that there are solutions to help us combat climate change and that people are working together to solve problems helped students stay in a place of curiosity; they didn’t show anxiety over the content.”
“There is something for all different kinds of learners. We are moving spaces, drawing, talking in big and small groups, writing. Some of my kiddos who would have been disengaged quite possibly the entire time were engaged in at least two or more parts of this lesson.”
“This is engaging because it uses real data about the state students live in and shows changes within their lifetime, like the rise of warehouses and trucking during the pandemic.”
“I have learned ways to improve my teaching, and I have been at this for 38 years. The students are gaining a deeper understanding of what climate change is: what causes climate change, and the impact of climate change on crop yield.”
“This lesson brought in cultural stories from the original people who inhabited California. This is a perspective that is not often taught in science. I think that the kids liked having science be a little less facts and figures and more story.”
“I love how the data was more interactive and chunked into smaller pieces. I also like how there was a way to bring all the knowledge and wondering back to come up with a conclusion to the problem.”
“When you’re out in the workforce, you’re trying to solve problems that don’t have a clear, immediate answer. So doing stuff like this helps give students practice.”
“I am so amazed and impressed by the depth of resources that you embedded in the teacher guide. This is really well put together.”
“Every lesson was so thoroughly designed, the case study design book was beautifully organized, and it helped to give my class a real-life understanding of how college/graduate-level academic research works. Being able to connect their research back to environmental issues they actually experience was simply icing on the cake. Well done!”
“The kids become more engaged because now they are actually actively doing things. They’re really having to look for themselves. It’s not given to them on a platter, but all the resources are right there.”
Kim Fortun, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Margaret Tebbe, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Prerna Srigyan, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Nadine Tanio, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Margaux Fisher, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Katie Vo, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Taranjot Bhari, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Aeris Melody Johnson, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Lena Fortun, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Sierra Howard, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Julia Lin, EcoGovLab, UC Irvine
Jennifer Janzen, WestEd
Maria Simani, CA Science Project
Matt Ellinger, Designer
Hosun Kang, UC Irvine
K. Lily Wu, OEHHA and Cal EPA
Wongyong Park, University of Southampton
Doron Zinger, CSU Dominguez Hills
Jean Flanagan, BSCS
Susan Lyons, Development Editor
Stacey Lane, Illustrator
Darin Newton, Development Editor
Erica Brauer, Granada Hills Charter
Shannan Johnson, Windsor USD
Graham Lockett, Culver City USD
Craig Manges, Lemoore UHSD
Kate Morris, The Waverly School
Laura Rivera, Torrance UUSD
